| Member: |
Jeff
La Fortune |
system |
|
|
|
|
| Jeff's
Audio Journey |
Below are a few things my
ears have taught me over the years. I did not intentionally
arrive at any of these, but let the music guide me there. Your
experiences will probably differ and for some very good
reasons, but thought I’d share them to generate some
discussion and maybe pass on some tips.
Amplification
With power amplifiers, the
first watt is the most important to get right. All the music
you hear goes "through" it, tube, transistor, or
whatever.
Transistors do some things
well, tubes do other things well – I know what my choice is.
My system sounds best when it
is pure analog and there is not a single transistor in the
signal path. Luckily, the audio world seems to agree – look
at all the turntables and valve gear now available.
Class A is best in class, all
other things being equal. Add to that single ended operation
and you have the foundation for great tunes. A low amount of
feedback is good and no feedback so much the better. Don’t
ask me for a reason, I have found this combination just sounds
better.
Simplicity rules in active
designs: Getting rid of excess gain stages is like going on a
diet – why feel bloated? I wish my preamp could lose a
couple cathode followers.
Directly heated triode power
amplification provides a "you are there" palpable
juiciness that you cannot get any other way, but this
technology has its limitations. With all their foibles, are
DHT SETs still the ticket? Hell ya, provided you hook them up
to the right speakers!
I never had a passive preamp
I was happy with over an extended period of time. They seem to
drain the life out of everything routed through them. As
Einstein said, "Make a system as simple as possible, but
not simpler," or something like that.
Sources
You can tell a great deal
about the overall balance and transient response of an entire
system just by the way vinyl surface noise, clicks, and pops
are reproduced. After many years and many rigs, this has been
an unwavering constant. If record noise does not "sound
right," anything on the record will not sound right
either.
Some LPs will remain quiet
and pop free over years of playing, while other will get noisy
right away - no matter what you do. I have always found that
vinyl quality the main reason albums either age gracefully or
turn unlistenable over a few plays. Sometimes only one side
goes bad, like my recent $30 180g reissue I just purchased –
ouch!
Exact cartridge set up is
very important, but not critical to extracting 90+% from
vinyl, (which, by the way is still 100% better than CDs). Of
course I’m anal about my cartridge setup, but then again I
don’t adjust arm height when switching between 180g and 200g
pressings.
Clean your records only if
you get them dirty. Tip - don’t get them dirty. I have
thirty-year-old albums that I occasionally play and the last
time I cleaned them was in college. And by the way, I like
paper sleeves better than plastic – they are stiffer, easier
to slide back into the record jacket and more environmentally
friendly.
Redbook CD can sound damn
nice, considering the limited medium. Unfortunately, it took
twenty years to arrive at "perfect sound forever."
Upsampling improves spaciousness, depth, smoothness, and
provides a more pleasing "analog-like" texture. I
liken it to progressive output for DVD.
I don’t know enough about
SACD and DVD-A to comment on. I will probably get into it now
as these are on their deathbeds. There will be cheaper
recordings coming onto the market, similar to vinyl in the
early 80’s. Get them while you can. The problem is that
these players will not be around in 20 years. I don’t ever
think there will be a Hi-Rez renaissance as with vinyl and I
really don’t see any other audiophile medium on the horizon
to replace it.
Speakers/Rooms
Low crossover slopes are
better and no crossovers best. I really don’t know why
certain loudspeaker manufacturers pride themselves on their
complex, multi-component, 10-pound 6db/oct crossovers. If I
designed this, I’d be embarrassed.
Phase and time coherence are
a prerequisite for a life-like performance. It does not need
to be perfect, but hey, try to get close or don’t bother!
It’s hard to beat a
well-constructed high efficiency, wide range paper-coned
dynamic driver for natural vocals, brass and woodwinds. Strong
magnetic fields coupled with low cone mass is key to dynamics.
Some people have particular
preferences for either planar, dynamic, bipolar, dipolar,
omni-directional, etc. I’ve had or heard them all and I say
to each their own. There’s no right or wrong here. As Joseph
Campbell once said, "Follow your bliss."
Correctly balance the
mid-bass in your system and you can gain perceived
"speed" and "pace" of a system without
making it sound too brittle or bright. This balance is
difficult to achieve and I’m still working on mine.
The room is the hardest thing
to compensate for when choosing a speaker. My problems have
always stemmed in the mid bass on down. Getting acceptable
midrange and treble can be mostly accomplished using room
treatments, speaker positioning, cables, and tubes, but the
fundamental room dimensions and accompanying bass modes are
the most difficult to compensate for. I think the new digital
subwoofer equalizers are a good idea as long as they are kept
in the subwoofer range only.
The best $500 I have ever
spent are for my room’s sound panels. No cost comparable
cable or component change ever came close.
The main thing a good
subwoofer will do is to provide a deeper soundstage and more
realistic ambiance retrieval. I don’t know why, but there is
a lot of phase information contained in low bass signals. It
might be string theory at work with those extra dimensions
curled inside the subsonic waveforms. Why don’t more
professional reviewers hear and comment on this obvious
improvement is beyond me.
Over the years, I have logged
many miles on my subwoofers looking for the best position in
my rooms. I have come to the conclusion that corner loading a
sub gives it the best combination of good low frequency
pressurization and phase alignment. It is amazing how much
difference can be had by moving the sub in or out of the
corner by a few inches.
With regard to positioning
left and right speakers, I try to get them within a quarter to
half inch of each other in relation to the listening location
(my head). This is your last chance to get it right before the
sound hits your eardrums.
I’ve tended to stay away
from speakers that contain metal dome tweeters, multiple
drivers and high order, complex crossovers. I have found them
to sound neutral but not engaging. Take a complex design,
throw in an average three-ohm impedance and low efficiency and
it spells train wreck. These manufacturers tend to show nice
off-axis computer plots and smooth lobing patterns but I try
to directly tame room influences and aim the speakers directly
at my ears.
Don’t worry about phase
polarity; just make sure your system is wired right and you’ll
have it correct about fifty-percent of the time. Saying that,
wire it wrong and you will still have it correct about
fifty-percent of the time.
I have always found
mini-monitors (as a whole) to image very well. I think part of
it is due to their narrow baffle and driver widths. I believe
some of it comes from their typical tipped up response and
little usable low bass. This artificially sharpens and defines
the images a bit more than full range speakers. Mid-bass
warmth and/or larger drivers tend to round out images and add
flesh to the music. As the old Mexican adage goes: "Meat
for the man, bones for the dog."
Cables
Short interconnect runs and
long speaker cables are preferred over long interconnects and
short speaker cables. Don’t know why, but that’s my story
and I’m sticking to it.
I’ve always preferred
shielded cables – they have always kept the noise out of my
system, but finding a good sounding shielded cable is much
harder than an unshielded type.
Solid core is preferred over
multi-strand - their sound is more direct, punchy and has
generally more guts to it. I’m a fan of the simplistic
single magnet wire designs, you can’t get much wrong with
these.
Silver containing cables
should always have the majority of their composition made out
of copper. Silver sounds a bit too "wiry" to me, pun
intended.
I have never heard any major
difference in biwiring speakers, other than the obvious result
of doubling the amount of copper.
I have never really heard any
detectable improvement with aftermarket power cords, but it
can’t hurt to have a few of them in your system – they may
all add up to something worthwhile. I think I need two more.
Tubes
Very simple: there are no
right or wrong types of tubes (octal, new, miniature, NOS,
Chinese, etc.). If they sound good in your situation – then
they are the right tubes. There is too much else going on in a
system to say with any certainty that a particular tube will
sound good. I currently use a mix of tubes that were not
allowed during the Cold War.
Exotic NOS stock tubes with
fancy pedigrees can sound excellent in any system. I have
found them to add sweetness and a bit euphonic, never a
problem in most instances.
Tweaks
To be honest, I am not a
serious tweaker. I try to focus on the main things than the
periphery. Rather than spend a whole bunch of money piecemeal
on many small tweaks, I’ll save up the cash and buy a whole
new component and upgrade that way. Try not to attach too much
sentiment to any one component and ditch a piece if a better
replacement comes along. All things equal, I really don’t
think a $2000 cable will make a $500 preamp sound better than
a $2300 preamp connected to a $200 cable – but again, that’s
my ears doing the talking.
I have always had some sort
of power conditioning. The hype says it cleans and purifies my
mains juice but I primarily use it for surge protection and a
place to conveniently plug in all my components. An added plus
is my unit has a cute analog meter, very old school. By the
way, my power conditioner was made by the same guy who used to
peddle secretly treated digital clocks.
I don’t use any sort of
vibration control other than having a good rack and spiking
the speakers. I should do more in this area – most
audiophiles swear by it. Call me lazy.
I turn off the air
conditioner, forced air heating, or any other appliances that
generate unwanted noise when I seriously listen. High
background noise levels reduce perceived dynamic range and
obscure low-level detail that I’ve tried so hard to get
right. I wish I had hot water heating.
Conclusion
Smoothness, warmth, and
detail are not mutually exclusive and don’t let anybody tell
you otherwise.
Some times when I listen to
my system, it sounds like shit, while other times it sounds
superb – it must be me. Music is an emotional experience and
I would guess to venture that my mood has something to do with
this.
Do you think your system
faithfully recreates the sound of a live performance in a real
space? Have my daughter play a short violin solo in your
listening room and then ask yourself the question again. I
know what your answer will be.
Above all, have fun.
Jeff
COMMENTS?
ABOUT
US | JOIN US
| MEMBER LOGIN | MEETING
SCHEDULE | RESOURCES/LINKS
|
CONTACT
| MEMBER SYSTEMS |
MEMBER PROJECTS | FORUMS
| REVIEWS | GALLERY
|
HOME
PAGE
Copyright©
North East Wisconsin Audio Society All Rights Reserved.
|